 |
| Defendant Phung Van Cu Em at the first instance trial of the People's Court of Vinh Long province.Photo: Document |
(VLO) The two sides did not contradict each other until they accidentally met at a drinking party, but only because of the insensitive words, the hooligan attitude led to scuffles and scuffles, causing people to go to prison and get injured.
In recent times, the situation of intentional crime causing injury is having many complicated developments, causing many consequences for insiders and society.
Cases that should have been solved "with reasonable understanding", but only because they were provoked by unbridled speech, "small things became big", leading to the consequences of people carrying injuries, people having to pay the price. by the strict judgment of the law.
Through the recent cases of "Intentional Injury" brought to trial by the court, most of the defendants are young, with impulsive and impulsive attitudes. On the other hand, some defendants used alcohol and did not control themselves, leading to impulsive actions.
The People's Court of Vinh Long province has just sentenced defendant Pham Vu Hao (SN 1994, living in Tam Binh district) to 2 years in prison for the crime of "Intentionally causing injury". The case happened on January 23 at a wedding in Long Phu commune (Tam Binh district), the defendant Hao and the victim NNS were both guests at the party.
Here, two people had a conflict, S. ran home to get a homemade knife to beat Hao. At this time, Hao had left for a while, when he saw S. holding a weapon, the defendant rushed into a house to get a knife to "fight" with S..
However, when Hao took the knife and slashed, he kicked the handle, the blade flew into S.'s abdomen. The victim was taken to the hospital for emergency treatment for more than 10 days with an injury rate of 53%.
The criminal behavior of defendant Hao is dangerous to society, not only infringing on the health of others but also causing insecurity, so the first instance court of the People's Court of Tam Binh district sentenced the defendant to 3 years in prison.
Realizing that he was at fault, right after the first-instance trial, victim S. made an appeal to reduce the punishment and asked for defendant Hao to enjoy a suspended sentence.
Although late, the defendant's repentance and the victim's sense of guilt were also recognized by the jury, since then the defendant was reduced to 1 year in prison, which is enough deterrent for the accused and is a lesson not only for the victim. but for many people in dealing with conflicts.
It can be seen that many serious cases stem from small conflicts in daily life. Just because of a lack of control, or an outburst of anger, not realizing the danger of words and actions leads to unfortunate consequences.
Besides, it must be mentioned that the negative influences from the negative sides of society, the abuse of stimulants, the loose management, education of the family, etc. have made a part of teenagers aware. deviant, playful, demanding, easily provoked and manipulated, leading to conflicts and law violations.
In the case of "Murder" being tried by the People's Court of Vinh Long province against defendant Phung Van Cu Em (SN 1992, living in TT Tan Quoi, Binh Tan district), also stemmed from a conflict on a drinking table that the defendant stabbed. was harmed many times. Accordingly, when I drank with my neighbors, LVS drove my friends to play.
"Joining the party" not long ago, S.'s friend talked loudly, I was not satisfied, so I sent this person back.
At this time, S. was lying in a hammock to witness the incident and thought that the drinking place was not Em's house, so the two argued. Not stopping, Em used a knife to attack S. causing injuries in the head, neck, and face areas, and ran to the next house to hide.
According to the assessment, S. was injured at a rate of 29%. Just because they were not satisfied with the words spoken at the drinking table, the victim and the accused used force to solve it, causing people to go to prison and people to get injured. According to the trial panel, because S. resisted, Em did not commit the crime to the end, S. did not die against the will of the defendant.
Meanwhile, after committing the crime, defendant Em saw that everyone took S. to the emergency room but did not help, ignoring the consequences that showed a hooligan nature, so he sentenced the defendant to 9 years in prison for the crime of “Murder. person” is the right person, the right sin.
Through the cases, it is also a lesson for people to restrain themselves and calmly find ways to deal with unnecessary conflicts in life.
On the other hand, in order to fight and prevent this type of crime, it is necessary to pay special attention to the role of management and education of families and local authorities for young people, especially those who are slow to develop, to avoid potential problems. Unfortunate consequences can occur.
TRUNG HUNG
