According to Engadget , Google recently officially introduced the Pixel Fold – the company's first product to enter the foldable smartphone segment. Like previous foldable devices, the Pixel Fold has a vertical hinge that allows it to open like a book.
The Pixel Fold and Galaxy Z Fold4 are two of the most noteworthy foldable smartphones currently available.
SCREENSHOT ENGADGET
When folded, users get a more traditional design with a 5.8-inch screen. When unfolded, users get a larger 7.6-inch screen for multitasking or watching videos . Both OLED panels have a 120Hz refresh rate and come with the Tensor G2 chip found in last year's Pixel 7 series. The product also stands out with its slim profile of just 12.1mm when folded and 5.8mm when unfolded, a battery that lasts over 24 hours, and a weight of 283 grams. The company also claims the hinge has virtually no gap.
However, when it hits the shelves, the Pixel Fold will face fierce competition from Samsung's Galaxy Z Fold4, a company with extensive experience in manufacturing foldable smartphones. To make a clearer comparison of the two products and help you choose, let's compare their specifications.
Pixel Fold | Galaxy Z Fold4 | |
Selling price | $1,799 (256GB), $1,919 (512GB) | $1,800 (256 GB), $1,920 (512 GB), $2,160 (1 TB) |
Size | When folded: 139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 mm When opened: 139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 mm | When folded: 155.1 x 67.1 x 14.2-15.8 mm When opened: 155.1 x 130.1 x 6.3 mm |
Weight | 283 grams | 263 grams |
Screen size | Outside: 5.8 inches Inside (when opened): 7.6 inches | Outside: 6.2 inches Inside (when opened): 7.6 inches |
Screen resolution | Outer: 2,092 x 1,080 (408 ppi) In (when unfolded): 2,208 x 1,840 (380 ppi) | Outside: 2,316 x 904 (402 ppi) In (when unfolded): 2,176 x 1,812 (374 ppi) |
Screen type | OLED (up to 120 Hz) Other features: 17.4:9 aspect ratio , maximum brightness up to 1,550 nits. In (when opened): 6:5 aspect ratio, maximum brightness up to 1,450 nits | AMOLED (up to 120 Hz) In addition: Aspect ratio 23.1:9 In (when opened): Aspect ratio 21.6:18, maximum brightness up to 1,200 nits |
Battery | 4,821 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
Internal memory | 256 GB or 512 GB | 256 GB, 512 GB, or 1 TB |
Expandable memory card slot | Are not | Are not |
Rear camera | Main camera: 48 MP, f/1.7 Ultrawide: 10.8 MP, f/2.2 Tele: 10.8 MP, f/3.05, 5x optical zoom, 20x Super Res zoom | Main camera: 50 MP, f/1.8 Ultrawide: 12 MP, f/2.2 Telephoto: 10 MP, f/2.4, 3x optical zoom, 30x digital zoom |
Front camera | 9.5 MP, f/2.2 | 10 MP, f/2.2 |
Internal camera | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 4 MP, f/1.8 |
Record a video | Rear camera: 4K at 30 fps, 60 fps Front camera: 4K at 30 fps, 60 fps Internal camera: 1080p at 30 fps | Rear camera: 8K at 24 fps, 4K at 60 fps Front camera: 4K at 30 fps, 60 fps |
Chip | Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
CPU | 8 cores (2 cores) Cortex-X1 2.85 GHz, 2 cores Cortex-A78 2.35 GHz, 4 cores Cortex-A55 1.8 GHz) | 8 cores (1 core) Cortex-X2 3.19 GHz, 3 cores Cortex-A710 2.75 GHz, 4 cores Cortex A-510 1.8 GHz |
GPU | ARM Mali-G710 MP7 | Adreno 730 |
RAM | 12 GB LPDDR5 | 12 GB LPDDR5 |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
Bluetooth | v5.2 | v5.2 |
NFC | Have | Have |
Operating system | Android 13 with 5 years of security updates | Android 12L (with support for Android 13 and One UI 5.1) with 4 years of operating system updates and 5 years of security updates. |
Color | Obsidian, Porcelain | Grayish blue, jet black, beige, burgundy |
Other features | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2, Qi wireless charging, 30W fast charging, Titan M2 security chip, IPX8 water resistance. | Supports S Pen, USB-C 3.2 Gen 1, Qi wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, 25W fast charging, IPX8 water resistance, Samsung DeX. |
Of course, specifications aren't everything when it comes to determining whether the Pixel Fold or Galaxy Z Fold4 is better, as it all depends on the user experience. Besides, the Galaxy Z Fold4 is set to be replaced by the Galaxy Z Fold5 this summer, so users have reason to postpone their purchase for a while longer if they're still hesitant about buying the Pixel Fold.
Source link






Comment (0)