SGGPO
On the afternoon of June 12, the People's Court of Nghe An province continued the appellate hearing of defendants Le Thi Dung (6 years old, former director of the Center for Continuing Education of Hung Nguyen district) and Nguyen Thi Huong (52 years old, former Central Accountant) for abusing positions and powers while on official duty.
 |
|
The scene of the trial of defendant Le Thi Dung |
The Judicial Council conducts questioning of defendants Le Thi Dung, Nguyen Thi Huong and people with related interests and obligations. The content of the questioning revolved around the development of internal spending regulations and regimes for leaders of the Continuing Education Center; The content revolves around Circular 28/2009/TT-BGDĐT on working regime for high school teachers…
In addition, the jury and the lawyer also asked the defendant Le Thi Dung and related people about the overlap between the payment of the responsibility of the Party cell secretary and the overtime teaching, training, and remuneration; Whether the internal spending regulations have to be sent to the Department of Education and Training, is the Continuing Education Center subject to the regulation of Circular 28?
|
The appellate trial of defendant Le Thi Dung |
In the response to the jury and the lawyer, defendant Dung said that all expenses for himself and his officers and employees are in accordance with internal spending regulations. This Regulation is publically formulated, sent to superiors, takes effect and does not violate the law. The defendant said that the first-instance level based on Circular 28/2009/TT-BGDDT on the working regime for high school teachers to make accusations was incorrect, because this circular did not stipulate the Center for Continuing Education. Defendant used and referred to Circular 28 to issue internal spending regulations because the defendant is also a teacher.
Defendant Dung said: “All enjoy the same as the defendants. It cannot be called an act of abusing position and power without proving that the defendant violated any regulations. Defendant Dung also said that the fact that defendant Nguyen Thi Huong knew it was wrong but still did it but was only sentenced to 24 months in prison for a suspended sentence, while the defendant herself was sentenced to 5 years in prison is "extremely unfair".
