According to the Office of the National Assembly, from March 26-28.3, in Hanoi, the 5th conference of full-time National Assembly deputies, term XV, will take place to discuss a number of contents submitted to the National Assembly at the 7th Session. XNUMX, XNUMXth National Assembly.
During the working session on March 27.3, the agency in charge of the verification will present a summary report on a number of major issues with differing opinions on the Law on Road Traffic Order and Safety project. Afterwards, the delegates will discuss and the submitting agency and verification agency will report and clarify some of the issues raised by the National Assembly delegates.
In the latest draft Law on Road Traffic Order and Safety, the Government has abandoned the proposal that the Traffic Police force be allowed to deduct at least 70% of fines for administrative violations of traffic order and safety. road after paying into the state budget.
Currently, Clause 1, Article 5 of the draft only stipulates the mobilization and use of resources to ensure road traffic order and safety. Ensure budget, facilities, modern vehicles and equipment, conditions to ensure and improve the capacity to perform tasks of forces directly ensuring road traffic order and safety.
Previously, in Clause 1, Article 5 of the draft law presented to the 31st session of the National Assembly Standing Committee, the Government proposed a regulation that the Traffic Police force would be allowed to deduct no less than 70% of fines for violations. administrative regulations on road traffic order and safety after being paid into the state budget and not less than 30% of the proceeds from license plate auctions after being paid into the central budget according to the provisions of law. .
Discussing at the 31st session of the National Assembly Standing Committee, Chairman of the Law Committee Hoang Thanh Tung said that this is a new proposal in the draft. If such an addition is made, the Government must have an assessment report. impact, clarify the impact on the state budget, and conformity with relevant legal regulations.
The Chairman of the Law Committee also stated clearly that the issue of sanctioning administrative violations is a content of the Law on Handling of Administrative Violations.
Accordingly, the law stipulates that proceeds from penalties for administrative violations must be paid in full to the state budget and must be managed and used in accordance with the law on state budget.
According to Mr. Hoang Thanh Tung, investing in the traffic police force and ensuring road traffic order and safety is necessary. But investing by deducting from the total amount of money collected in this field or the state budget arranged according to general regulations needs to be done very clearly, very clearly and must ensure consistency.
If the draft regulations are inconsistent with the provisions of the Law on Handling of Administrative Violations.
On the other hand, there are many areas of administrative sanctions, why does each of these areas stipulate a percentage deduction while other areas do not, while there are also many important areas?
"We suggest that we should design general policy principles like the draft law that the Government presented at the 6th session," Mr. Hoang Thanh Tung stated.
The Chairman of the Legal Committee said that if the 30% deduction policy is included, it is not consistent with the content of the draft, inconsistent with the general policy and relevant laws. We request further clarification in the spirit of keeping the draft presented at the 6th meeting.
