Will Google be forced to sell Chrome?

This proposed amendment comes after a court ruling against Google's practices, which stressed that selling Chrome is necessary to create a more competitive environment. This is part of the DOJ's efforts to address what it considers to be the monopolistic control issues occurring in the search engine market.

Are Google and Chrome about to go their separate ways?

The DOJ argues that Google's ownership of Chrome, combined with its dominant position as a search engine, is creating barriers to fair competition. Forcing Google to sell Chrome would open opportunities for new competitors to establish a crucial gateway for internet searches, thereby diminishing Google's current control.

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti emphasized: "We proved Google violated antitrust laws in a federal court. Now is the time to address this issue. The proposed remedial package will hold Google accountable for its search monopoly and protect consumers by promoting competition."

Many challenges would arise if Chrome were no longer owned by Google.

However, selling Chrome also presents several challenges. One major concern is how the new owner will manage the browser. Currently, Google offers the Chromium open-source project, allowing other developers to build their own browsers. If a new owner decides to discontinue this open-source project, it could negatively impact many other companies and developers.

Chrome is actually being managed very well by Google.

Google is expected to present its own proposed amendments soon and has expressed its intention to appeal the initial antitrust ruling. The proceedings will continue, with a hearing scheduled for April and a final decision expected before September of this year. These developments highlight the ongoing debate over how to regulate large technology companies and ensure a competitive market.

Some argue that Google being forced to sell Chrome could lead to major changes in how users access and use the web. Depending on the new owner, users may face changes in features, updates, or even browser availability. While the goal is to create more competition, there is also the potential for unintended consequences.

Also related to the DOJ's decision, the agency dropped its earlier proposal requiring Google to sell its Android operating system, indicating a shift in focus towards Chrome as the key to resolving the monopoly issue. Additionally, the DOJ eased restrictions on Google's investments in artificial intelligence (AI) companies, reflecting the strategic importance of this sector in the effort to maintain America's leading position.

Source: https://thanhnien.vn/google-se-bi-buoc-phai-ban-chrome-185250309225506473.htm