The People's Petition Committee of the National Assembly Standing Committee has just issued Documents No. 222/BDN and 223/BDN on transferring petitions from citizens in the City. Ho Chi Minh to Chairman of the City People's Committee. Ho Chi Minh to consider and resolve.
Accordingly, the People's Committee received a petition from Mr. Bui Thanh Tuan and Mr. Le Minh Thang (residing in Thu Duc City, petition sent to the Vice Chairman of the National Assembly) with content reflecting and recommending reconsideration of the implementation of the policy. Compensation, support and resettlement policy for component project 2 of Ring Road 3 section through the city. Ho Chi Minh (in Thu Duc City).
“Based on the functions and tasks specified in Resolution 1156/2016/UBTVQH13 dated March 17.3.2016, XNUMX of the National Assembly Standing Committee, the People's Committee respectfully forwards citizens' applications to the Chairman of Ho Chi Minh City People's Committee to Review and direct resolution according to authority and in accordance with the law; Respond to citizens and report resolution results to the People's Prayer Committee to carry out the task of supervising the resolution of complaints and denunciations of the National Assembly Standing Committee," the document of the People's Prayer Committee clearly states.
It is known that Mr. Tuan and Mr. Thang are households whose houses and land are adjacent to the frontages of major roads Nguyen Duy Trinh and Nguyen Xien that were revoked to implement the above project.
In the above letter, citizens reflected and proposed many issues such as the compensation price for agricultural land located deep in the alley, without roads from 5,8-6 million VND/m2, and the compensation price for agricultural land in the middle of the street. The frontage of Nguyen Duy Trinh, Nguyen Xien, Tam Da... is only 7,6 million VND/m2, while the market price is from 50-70 million VND/m2.
Citizens also reported that on the same Nguyen Xien route, the price of agricultural land in Binh Duong province is more than 16,7 million VND/m2 (3 times higher) than in the city. Ho Chi Minh.
In addition, citizens also reflect that the application of the land price coefficient (K coefficient) in the compensation and support unit price has many shortcomings. Specifically, the K coefficient of urban residential land and land with perennial crops located right in front of a major road has a lower K coefficient than land located in alleys or land not adjacent to the road.
According to Document No. 314/CSBT-HDBT dated April 26.4.2023, 1 of the City People's Committee. Thu Duc, the K coefficient of land planted with perennial crops at location 17,04 (adjacent to Nguyen Xien, Nguyen Duy Trinh, Tam Da streets) is more than 2, lower than locations 19,3 (not adjacent to Nguyen Xien and Nguyen Duy Trinh streets). , Tam Da) K coefficient 3; lower than position 22.1528 (no Nguyen Xien, Nguyen Duy Trinh, Tam Da streets) coefficient K XNUMX.
Mr. Luong Ngoc Lam (household whose land was recovered) said: "We do not understand why the K coefficient of road frontage land is lower than in alleys, while land frontage on large roads has many advantages and values." more economical. The government needs to explain to the people what law and how to apply it?
Since then, citizens whose land adjacent to the main road frontage was recovered by the above project have requested the authorities to review the compensation and support unit price so that it is closer to market reality and in accordance with their wishes. of citizens, fairness between localities...
Mr. Bui Thanh Tuan said that, eThis is a complicated, long-lasting case and affects the rights of many households related to many provinces. Among them, only City. Ho Chi Minh and Binh Duong have two different compensation mechanisms for the same road and the same project. In Binh Duong, the compensation price for agricultural land is 2 times higher than in the city. Ho Chi Minh; Binh Duong calculates land for perennial crops as 3% of residential land, while City. Ho Chi Minh took the agricultural land price list and multiplied the K coefficient.
Clearly, the two different calculation methods lead to the benefits of street frontage households in the city. Ho Chi Minh was greatly disadvantaged. Therefore, it is necessary for the Central departments to step in to clarify whether the City. Ho Chi Minh was right or Binh Duong was right to create consensus among the people. If the compensation price is satisfactory, people are willing to hand over the premises.
Regarding this case, the Central Citizen Reception Committee (Government Inspectorate) has also just sent Transfer Note No. 941/BTCDTW-XLD to the Chairman of the City People's Committee. Ho Chi Minh on transferring citizenship applications. Accordingly, the Government Inspectorate transferred citizen Phan Thanh Long's application to the Chairman of the City People's Committee. Ho Chi Minh City to direct functional departments to consider and resolve.
Mr. Long proposed that the government consider compensation, support, and resettlement for his family due to land acquisition to implement the Ring Road 3 project (mentioned above). Mr. Long reflected that the compensation price was too low and the price of agricultural land in the city. Ho Chi Minh City is only 1/3 of the compensated agricultural land price in Binh Duong province.
Mr. Long also reflected that his family's case was in the process of complaining, and the dialogue had not yet been completed when the City People's Committee. Thu Duc again issued a decision to coerce land recovery and assign a construction unit to work on his land.
