
Illustrative image.
The specific method is entirely up to the local authorities to decide, including whether or not to apply weighting factors to the exam scores when calculating admission scores.
In reality, some localities do not use weighting factors to ensure equal scores for all subjects, but many others have maintained the practice of multiplying Literature and Mathematics by a factor of 2 for many years. Regardless of the regulations, each place has its own rationale.
Those who support giving more weight to Mathematics and Literature argue that these are two fundamental subjects that should always be included in important exams; they require more study time and longer exam periods. Investing in mastering these two subjects will give students many advantages throughout their studies, exams, and university admissions.
Disagreements focused on the holistic educational goals of the curriculum, both the 2006 and 2018 versions. Some argued that weighting Math and Literature would disadvantage and pressure students who excel in other subjects, and encourage unbalanced learning, differentiating between core and elective subjects. Others pointed out that weighting created the illusion of higher scores without a clear understanding of the actual results. However, the majority of opinions supported weighting specialized subjects in the entrance exams for specialized high schools.
The question of whether or not to apply weighting factors will continue to be raised in the 10th grade entrance exam starting next year – the first exam under the 2018 General Education Program. This is also the first year that learning from lower secondary to upper secondary school will be synchronized according to the new curriculum.
The 2018 General Education Program continues the holistic education approach, helping students develop morally, intellectually, physically, and aesthetically. However, this perspective is more thoroughly reflected in the regulations on testing and evaluation. Specifically, according to Circular No. 22/2021/TT-BGDĐT dated July 20, 2021, on the evaluation of secondary and high school students, one of the conditions to become an "excellent student" is to have at least 6 subjects with an average score of 9.0 or higher; a "good student" needs at least 6 subjects with an average score of 8.0 or higher.
Therefore, it is natural that there are cases where students are excellent/outstanding, but still score below 8/9 in Math or Literature. Responding to the press, the Director of the Secondary Education Department ( Ministry of Education and Training ), Nguyen Xuan Thanh, stated that this regulation reflects the view that all subjects are treated equally, with no subject being considered primary or secondary, and that only those who excel in Math or Literature are considered excellent students.
This has led to many opinions leaning towards the idea that the 10th grade entrance exam under the 2018 General Education Program should not place excessive weight on any particular subject (except for specialized subjects). In addition, many argue that only two subjects, Mathematics and Literature, should be tested (neither subject weighted), similar to the high school graduation exam from 2025 onwards, which only requires these two subjects as compulsory – a streamlined approach that reduces pressure while still effectively assessing students. Some argue that the exam should assess fundamental knowledge and the qualities and skills students demonstrate across all subjects...
Currently, most localities have not yet developed admission plans for 10th grade high school from 2025 onwards. The decentralized examination system at the local level likely leads to a "proliferation of different approaches." The practice of weighting exams (especially in cases with three or more subjects) may still be maintained in many localities. However, what certainly needs to change is that the exam questions need to better assess students' abilities and qualities. This would be easier if there were general guidance and direction from the Ministry of Education and Training.
Source






Comment (0)