Vietnam.vn - Nền tảng quảng bá Việt Nam

Put candidates' interests first

In 2025, the graduation exam and university entrance exam are considered a pivotal year for innovation under the new General Education Program. It is undeniable that the efforts of the entire sector, headed by the Ministry of Education and Training, have also revealed limitations in university and college admissions related to the rights of more than half a million candidates applying for university entrance exams.

Báo Sài Gòn Giải phóngBáo Sài Gòn Giải phóng24/07/2025

From now until 5:00 p.m. on July 28, candidates only have a few days to calculate their choice of major - school, starting their journey of independence to prepare for building a career for the future after 12 years of studying. However, the "innovation" of the Ministry of Education and Training in converting high school transcript scores, scores of separate exams (ability assessment, thinking assessment, specialized ability assessment, V-SAT...) to a 30-point scale (combination of 3 subjects for admission) when considering university admission has not only confused candidates, parents, admissions experts but also universities and colleges.

Why did this situation happen? In fact, last March, when the Ministry of Education and Training informed about the regulations on score conversion, there were many opinions and analyses about the unreasonableness, but the Ministry of Education and Training did not provide a common formula for schools to use as a basis. That is why, currently, although the same score of the Hanoi National University's competency assessment exam is converted to a 30-point scale in different schools.

Even more confusing, the organizing unit, Hanoi National University, came up with a conversion formula with results that differed by several points compared to other schools. Although the Ministry of Education and Training required this calculation to be “public and transparent”, the candidates did not understand the different results at all!

The 2025 high school graduation exam has two main subjects: Math and Literature, and two elective subjects from the subjects of the new General Education Program including: Physics, Chemistry, Biology, History, Geography, Economic and Legal Education, Information Technology, English, Technology. This makes the number of university admission combinations in 2025 quite large and diverse (some schools have up to 30-40 combinations; in 2024, there are usually 4 combinations), some schools allow candidates to choose their own subjects for the admission combination.

However, the Ministry of Education and Training only published the percentile table of 7 groups for schools to use as a basis for conversion, including: A00 (Math, Physics, Chemistry), A01 (Math, Physics, English), B00 (Math, Chemistry, Biology), C00 (Literature, History, Geography), D01 (Math, Literature, English), C01 (Math, Physics, Literature), D07 (Math, Chemistry, English). So what do schools that use dozens of groups other than the 7 groups with data from the Ministry of Education and Training or candidates using other groups use as a basis for calculating the conversion (!?).

This not only makes it difficult for schools but also seriously affects the rights of candidates. So what is the "dark spot" of the conversion outside the 7 above combinations to make it public and transparent to candidates and who is responsible when candidates complain?

According to experts, high school transcript scores account for 50% of a candidate's graduation score; separate exams organized by each school have different scoring scales (some schools have a 1,200-point scale, some schools have a 150-point scale...) and have different exam structures (even though they are knowledge-summary tests); the 2025 high school graduation exam is a subject-by-subject exam.

So converting to a 30-point scale based on the 2025 high school graduation exam scores is completely unconvincing. The sampling is not uniform to give a common result, then the basis for deciding the pass or fail result of each candidate in the fierce competition to enter university is a completely unconvincing problem.

Innovation in any field is necessary, but the ultimate goal of innovation is to bring practical values, facilitate the subjects and all must be public, transparent, ensuring fairness. University and college admissions are fiercely competitive, the difference between passing and failing is only 0.01 points. Therefore, the introduction of a new regulation that has not created consensus, is not convincing and is creating complexity and confusion for the admission process needs to be quickly resolved by the Ministry of Education and Training to ensure the rights of hundreds of thousands of candidates.

Source: https://www.sggp.org.vn/dat-quyen-loi-thi-sinh-len-hang-dau-post805322.html


Comment (0)

No data
No data
The powerful formation of 5 SU-30MK2 fighters prepares for the A80 ceremony
S-300PMU1 missiles on combat duty to protect Hanoi's sky
Lotus blooming season attracts tourists to the majestic mountains and rivers of Ninh Binh
Cu Lao Mai Nha: Where wildness, majesty and peace blend together
Hanoi is strange before storm Wipha makes landfall
Lost in the wild world at the bird garden in Ninh Binh
Pu Luong terraced fields in the pouring water season are breathtakingly beautiful
Asphalt carpets 'sprint' on North-South highway through Gia Lai
PIECES of HUE - Pieces of Hue
Magical scene on the 'upside down bowl' tea hill in Phu Tho

Heritage

Figure

Business

No videos available

News

Political System

Local

Product