The necessity

Whenever a new policy directly affecting people's lives is introduced, especially in the fields of energy, environment, or consumption, diverse opinions often emerge. This is normal in modern society. However, it is noteworthy that along with legitimate concerns, based on the need for complete and transparent information, there are also many subjective, speculative, and even distorted interpretations of the issue; thereby creating unnecessary skepticism and anxiety in public opinion.

From June 1st, all gas stations nationwide will switch to selling E10 gasoline instead of RON 95 gasoline.

Prior to the policy, effective June 1, 2026, requiring unleaded gasoline (according to current national technical standards) to be blended into E10 gasoline for use in gasoline engines nationwide, there have been many conflicting opinions and concerns that this will increase usage costs, affect low-income earners, and damage engines. More dangerously, noticing public concern, terrorist and reactionary organizations abroad, along with extremist pro-democracy groups, have continuously published articles distorting the truth, claiming that the government is "oppressing the people," "pushing the poor to the brink," "disregarding everything for group interests," and that this fuel could "destroy engines"... However, from a scientific, economic , and long-term development perspective, it can be affirmed that promoting the use of E10 gasoline is necessary and an inevitable trend in the process of sustainable development.

First and foremost, it's important to affirm that E10 gasoline is not a strange concept or a risky experiment. This type of gasoline, blended with approximately 10% fuel ethanol and 90% mineral gasoline, has been adopted by many countries for years as a solution to reduce dependence on fossil fuels and cut emissions. In the context of climate change, air pollution, and increasing pressure for energy transition, access to more environmentally friendly fuels is no longer just an encouraged option, but is gradually becoming a necessity.

The first and most obvious benefit of E10 gasoline is environmental. Ethanol is bio-derived, and when blended with traditional gasoline, it can contribute to reducing harmful emissions and carbon emissions during engine operation. While the reduction may not be a dramatic change, the cumulative impact is significant across tens of millions of gasoline-powered vehicles nationwide. An energy policy cannot simply look at individual liters of gasoline or individual vehicles, but must consider the synergistic effects on air quality, public health, and long-term social costs.

Many argue that switching to E10 gasoline is "disregarding the poor," as it could alter usage habits or lead to concerns about increased costs. While this argument sounds relatable, it doesn't fully reflect the issue. In reality, low-income earners are the group most affected by environmental degradation, poor air quality, or significant energy price fluctuations. An energy system heavily reliant on imported fossil fuels or traditional sources faces numerous risks related to pricing, energy security, and social costs. Diversifying fuels and developing bio-blending solutions is not just a technical matter; it's a step towards long-term economic stability.

It's also important to look at the broader picture; E10 gasoline isn't simply a matter of gas stations. It involves the entire fuel ethanol production value chain, from agriculture and processing industries to logistics, trade, and technical standards. If managed transparently, according to regulations, and under a competitive market mechanism, the development of biofuels can open up opportunities for domestic production, create jobs, promote industry linkages, and contribute to enhancing energy self-sufficiency.

Some extreme opinions attribute this to "special interest groups." In reality, any economic policy related to production, supply, and consumption impacts businesses and markets. However, impacting the market does not equate to "special interest groups." The core issue is whether the policy is built on a legal basis, technical standards, monitoring mechanisms, and transparency. If the implementation process ensures transparency in quality, control of blending, fair competition, and clear accountability, then the value of an entire energy transition strategy cannot be denied due to unfounded inferences.

The distorted narratives of reactionary organizations.

One of the most common concerns is the claim that E10 gasoline "destroys engines." This is an exaggerated and misleading statement, but it is technically inaccurate. Most modern gasoline engines are designed to be compatible with E10 fuel. Many car and motorcycle manufacturers worldwide have incorporated ethanol-blended fuels into their operating standards. For newer vehicles, using E10 is generally not an unusual risk if the fuel meets standards and is distributed correctly. Of course, this doesn't mean all impacts are negligible. For some older vehicles, degraded fuel systems or incompatible materials may cause certain technical problems such as corrosion, sediment buildup, or reduced performance if poorly maintained. However, this is an issue that needs to be assessed based on vehicle type, technical standards, and usage instructions; it cannot be simply stated that "E10 gasoline destroys engines." It is this exaggeration and generalization that distorts social perception.

Any transition process involves an adaptation lag. Changes in consumer habits, public apprehension, the need to improve the quality of the storage and distribution system, and the responsibility for fuel inspection are all real challenges. These concerns should not be denied. However, acknowledging the difficulties does not mean delaying or denying the necessity of change. The important thing is that the implementation process must put the people at the center. Information must be transparent; standards must be clear; fuel quality must be strictly controlled; and authorities, businesses, and vehicle manufacturers must provide specific guidance for each vehicle group, especially older models. When people have access to accurate information, their rights are protected, and they see the long-term benefits, social consensus will increase.

History shows that many changes that were initially met with skepticism become inevitable when society understands and adapts correctly. The transition to cleaner fuels is no exception. A sustainable economy cannot rely solely on short-term consumer thinking. A society seeking a higher quality of life cannot ignore the environment. A nation aiming for energy security cannot lag behind in this transition.

Ultimately, the adoption of E10 gasoline is not just about a single fuel type. It represents a shift in development thinking, from exploitation to reduction; from dependence to diversification; from short-term benefits to long-term responsibility. There may be initial shortcomings, areas for improvement, and concerns that need addressing. But viewed through the lens of science, responsibility, and the common good, it can be affirmed that this is necessary and an inevitable trend. And when the right policy is implemented transparently, with public consensus, serious business practices, and strict oversight from regulatory agencies, any negative impacts will only be temporary and entirely remedied. What remains is a shared vision towards a larger goal: economic development coupled with a safe and sustainable living environment for today and tomorrow.

Trung Tin

Source: https://baophutho.vn/viec-can-thiet-255092.htm