Politburo: Bureaucratic officials who are distant from the people may be dismissed from their positions.

(Dan Tri) - According to the Politburo's regulations, bureaucratic officials who are distant from the people and do not promptly resolve legitimate opinions and complaints from the people and businesses may be considered for removal from office.

Regulation No. 377 of the Politburo on decentralization of cadre management and planning, appointment, nomination, suspension, dismissal, resignation, and dismissal of cadres has just been issued.

The dismissal, resignation and removal of officials are among the important contents mentioned in Regulation No. 377.

In principle, the Politburo requires timely consideration of dismissal, resignation, and removal of officials when there is sufficient basis. “Do not remove officials from their positions or resign them if they are in a position to be dismissed,” Regulation 377 clearly states.

The Politburo also encourages officials to voluntarily resign from their positions when they do not meet job requirements, no longer have enough prestige, or their violations do not warrant dismissal.

Cases considered for resignation of officials

According to the Politburo's regulations, the head is considered to be dismissed from his position (except in cases of force majeure or the head has held the position for less than 1 year) when the locality, agency or unit only completes less than 70% of the targets and tasks according to the program and plan in the year, or fails to complete 5 basic socio -economic targets...

Officials responsible (except in cases of force majeure) if the results of implementing assigned targets and tasks on Party building, institution building, socio-economic development, national defense and security assurance, etc., according to the assessment of competent authorities, do not meet the targets, etc., will also be considered for dismissal from office.

Panorama of the 12th Central Conference (Photo: Doan Bac).

Consideration for removal from office also applies to bureaucratic officials who are distant from the people and do not promptly resolve the opinions, wishes, interests, legitimate and legal complaints and denunciations of the people and businesses.

Officials responsible for allowing complicated hot spots to occur for a long time and being concluded and assessed by competent authorities to cause serious consequences; and leaders who are irresponsible and fail to promptly handle serious violations when discovering officials and party members under their direct management... will also be considered for removal from office.

Regarding resignation, the Politburo stipulates that officials voluntarily resign and are considered for resignation when there is one of the following grounds:

(1) Due to personal recognition of limitations in leadership and management capacity or no longer having enough prestige to fulfill assigned duties and tasks.

(2) There are more than 50% of low confidence votes at the voting period as prescribed.

(3) For other personal reasons.

(4) Being the head of an agency or unit under his/her direct management or direct subordinate's authority, allowing serious corruption, waste, or negativity to occur but not to the extent that disciplinary action must be considered according to regulations.

(5) During the term of office, there are 2 non-consecutive years of being classified as not completing the task.

(6) Having committed acts of violation of political qualities, ethics, lifestyle and being concluded and assessed by competent authorities as causing public outrage and negatively affecting the reputation of the organization or individual.

(7) Letting the wife, husband, or children violate the law of the State; falling into social evils and being concluded and evaluated by competent authorities, causing public outrage, negatively affecting the reputation of oneself and the agency or unit.

(8) Letting others take advantage of one's position and power for personal gain and being concluded and assessed by competent authorities to cause serious consequences, public outrage, and negatively affect the reputation of individuals and organizations (except in cases where one is unaware) .

(9) Not daring to do, not daring to take responsibility, shirking responsibility, avoiding responsibility, not performing work within one's authority according to assigned functions and tasks and being concluded and assessed by competent authorities to cause very serious consequences, bad public opinion, and resentment among cadres, party members and people.

In the case mentioned in point (2) above, if the officer does not voluntarily resign, the competent authority shall consider removing him/her from office.

In the cases mentioned in points (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9) above, if the officer does not voluntarily resign, the competent authority shall consider dismissal.

Cases of dismissal

Regarding dismissal, the Politburo clearly stipulates a number of cases:

- Disciplined with a warning and assessed by competent authorities as having limited capacity, reduced reputation, and unable to continue holding the assigned position.

- Being disciplined with reprimand related to assigned duties and tasks 2 times or more during a term or appointment period.

- There are more than 2/3 of the low confidence votes at the voting period as prescribed.

- Having been classified as not completing tasks for 2 consecutive years (related to performing assigned duties and tasks).

- Being concluded by a competent authority to have degraded political ideology, ethics, lifestyle, "self-evolution", "self-transformation"; violating things that party members are not allowed to do; violating the responsibility to set an example, causing public outrage, negatively affecting the reputation of oneself and the agency or unit where one is working.

- Concluded by a competent authority to have violated political standards according to regulations on internal political protection of the Party to the extent of being dismissed.

- Being the head of an agency or unit under his/her direct management or responsibility or directly subordinates, causing corruption, waste, and negativity, causing very serious consequences according to the conclusion of a competent authority, but not to the extent that disciplinary action must be considered and handled according to regulations.

- Being the head of an agency or unit under direct management or responsibility, causing serious conflicts and disunity according to the conclusion of a competent authority.

- Violating Party regulations and State laws to the extent of being dismissed upon recommendation of competent authorities.

According to the regulations of the Politburo, the authority with the authority to appoint and introduce candidates for election according to regulations has the authority to consider and decide to allow officials to cease holding positions, resign, or dismiss.

For cadres under the decision-making authority of superiors, the Party Committee, Party organization, and collective leadership shall report to the agency or unit employing the cadre to propose to the competent authority to remove them from office, resign, or dismiss them.

Source: https://dantri.com.vn/thoi-su/bo-chinh-tri-can-bo-quan-lieu-xa-dan-co-the-bi-cho-thoi-giu-chuc-vu-20251017112307907.htm