Bluetooth and AirDrop: Similar, but not the same

You've used Bluetooth to listen to music through headphones, AirDrop to send photos, but have you ever tried to compare them?

Users use both Bluetooth and Airdrop to serve their daily connectivity needs.

Both are wireless connections, both are available in the phone, but Bluetooth and AirDrop have two completely different approaches in terms of speed, range and convenience.

Many iPhone users are familiar with using both, but have never thought about how they differ and why they exist in parallel.

How are Bluetooth and AirDrop different?

Bluetooth, which has been around since the late 1990s, quickly became the default technology on many personal electronic devices.

Bluetooth works by having two devices recognize each other when they are in close proximity, then pair and transfer data over radio waves. This process often requires manual confirmation from the user and can be time-consuming if the devices are not well-matched.

AirDrop is different. It’s Apple’s own feature that combines Bluetooth and WiFi to work. Bluetooth is used to detect nearby devices, while WiFi is used to transfer data at high speeds.

Notably, AirDrop does not require a connection to any WiFi network. When needed, the iPhone can create a direct WiFi connection between two nearby Apple devices, called a peer-to-peer connection. Thanks to that, data is transferred much faster and more stable than pure Bluetooth.

The most obvious difference between the two technologies lies in the philosophy of use. Bluetooth was developed to operate flexibly in diverse device environments, regardless of platform.

AirDrop, on the other hand, is only for Apple devices, where data sharing is automated and encapsulated within a pre-synchronized system. Both are wireless sharing, but one prioritizes wide connectivity, the other focuses on simplifying the experience within a limited range.

When speed and convenience do not go together

In everyday life, Bluetooth is often used to connect to peripheral devices such as headphones, speakers, smart watches or car entertainment systems. These connections are established once, then automatically remembered and reactivated the next time they are used.

Bluetooth is also present on most electronic devices today, so users can use it immediately without worrying about the platform or manufacturer.

Meanwhile, AirDrop is suitable for situations that require quick sharing between compatible devices in close proximity, such as sending photos you just took, sharing files, or transferring links during a live exchange. Users only need to perform a few simple steps to select the recipient. However, this feature does not work if the receiving device is not part of the Apple ecosystem, and sometimes it is limited if the privacy settings are not suitable.

No technology is inherently better. Bluetooth is broad and well suited to communicating between a wide range of devices. AirDrop can save time in specific situations, provided the support conditions are met. Choosing the right solution allows users to move faster, rather than getting stuck due to misunderstanding the limitations of each technology.

Not a substitute, but a complement

In reality, Bluetooth and AirDrop don't compete directly, but rather exist as two complementary pieces of the user experience.

Bluetooth is responsible for long-term, cross-platform connectivity. It keeps your headphones connected to your phone, your smartwatch updated with notifications, and your car's in-car devices synced with your phone regardless of the platform you're using.

AirDrop focuses on quick, instant sharing, usually for just a few minutes and then it’s over. Without the need for pairing or establishing a permanent connection, AirDrop solves the need to quickly send files between two people standing next to each other, as long as both are using compatible devices. Because of its “instant communication” nature, AirDrop is not intended to replace Bluetooth, but to work in parallel to serve other needs.

The juxtaposition of these two technologies also reflects an important reality: not every new technology replaces the old. While AirDrop may have come later and been more convenient in some situations, it has not replaced Bluetooth as a permanent, cross-platform, universal connection.

And Bluetooth, while slower at sending data, is still at the core of many modern electronics. The two technologies exist not because they're the same, but because they serve completely different purposes.

THANH THU

Source: https://tuoitre.vn/bluetooth-va-airdrop-tuong-giong-hoa-ra-khong-20250703145821103.htm