At the conference of full-time National Assembly Deputies (from April 5-7), giving opinions on the draft Land Law (amended), National Assembly Delegate Ho Thi Kim Ngan ( Bac Kan ) said: Article 69 of the draft Law on adjusting land use planning and plans stipulates that during the implementation process, adjustments can be made to the scale, location or land use needs of households and individuals, but will not change the land use indicators according to land type and land use areas according to functions in the land use planning.
Regarding this content, Delegate Ho Thi Kim Ngan said that the land use quota of projects in the area of land use conversion of households and individuals has been determined in the planning to expand the scale, location or needs of households and individuals outside the planning will certainly change the land use quota according to the functional area. For example, it is necessary to adjust the scale of the location of a traffic project within the planning and recover the conversion of land use purposes of types of land such as rice land and production forest land. At that time, the land use quota according to the type of land for traffic infrastructure will increase and the land use quota of rice land and forest land according to the functional area at the project implementation location will change. According to Delegate Ho Thi Kim Ngan, this regulation is not appropriate, suggesting that further research be conducted to clarify this issue.
National Assembly Delegate Ho Thi Kim Ngan (Bac Kan) speaks at the meeting.
Meanwhile, National Assembly Deputy Nguyen Van Manh ( Vinh Phuc ) expressed concern about the provisions in Article 58 of the draft Law, which stipulates that district-level land use plans are established annually and are not consistent with reality.
Delegate Nguyen Van Manh analyzed that the annual land use planning also depends on the annual public investment plan. While the implementation of the public investment plan is always subject to adjustment, the annual land use planning may be delayed. Therefore, the delegate suggested that the Drafting Committee stipulate that the district-level land use planning is 5 years as in the 2003 Land Law.
National Assembly Delegate Nguyen Van Manh spoke to contribute ideas to the draft Land Law (amended).
National Assembly Deputy Nguyen Van Manh also said that the provisions in Article 61 of the draft Law on land use planning must be detailed for each approved project. However, in practice, many projects have been approved in the medium-term public investment plan and annual public investment plan, but implementation is slow, even when the planning period, annual land use plan, or 5-year provincial plan has not been completed.
Therefore, the delegate suggested that the draft Law should not specify the land use plan for each construction item and project, but only state and specify the targets, area, location, and construction items to ensure convenient implementation in practice and flexibility with current conditions.
Concerned about multi-purpose land use, National Assembly Deputy Nguyen Tuan Anh (Long An) said that construction and investment on mixed land is very diverse, often proposed by investors, causing difficulties in management, putting pressure on population size, socio-economic infrastructure and traffic pressure. Regulations that land can have too many uses at the same time will also cause difficulties for land management in general and the implementation of financial obligations in particular.
National Assembly delegate Nguyen Tuan Anh said that regulating land for multiple uses at the same time will cause difficulties for land management in general and the implementation of financial obligations in particular. (Illustration photo, internet source).
Therefore, Delegate Nguyen Tuan Anh suggested that there should be specific regulations to control the number of functions used, thereby having a basis for management, avoiding imbalance in land use. Continue to supplement and perfect the draft Law on types of land used for multiple purposes. At the same time, there should be more specific regulations on the main land use purpose in the use of multi-purpose land; study and supplement specific regulations on the principles of determining financial obligations for users of multi-purpose land.
Source
Comment (0)