It's no longer surprising to hear about students using ChatGPT and possibly other AI-powered tools to easily tackle assignments in various subjects. But there's also no reason to ban the use of such tools.
Because it's certainly impossible to ban it. What resources would be needed to monitor students every minute of every day to ensure they don't touch ChatGPT when smartphones are always in their hands and internet connectivity seems to be ever-present in the atmosphere?
The school is confused, and it's understandable that the teachers are confused. Just recently, teachers felt confident because what they taught their students was something the students would hear and learn for the first time, thanks to the teachers' knowledge and efforts. But ChatGPT, and the vast ecosystem of digital information and knowledge behind it, has redefined that. Just recently, homework was one of the important tools for pedagogical practice, putting students under pressure to do exercises to reinforce their knowledge and solve difficult problems to improve their thinking skills. Now, that might lose its effectiveness. I tried putting a sample math problem, considered very difficult, into ChatGPT, and the application returned the result in a flash. And it even included clear step-by-step explanations, patiently clarifying any parts the reader didn't understand.
I remember back in school, it wasn't unusual to ask adults for help with difficult math problems or ask smarter friends for help. Of course, figuring things out on your own without asking for help was incredibly satisfying. However, learning how to solve problems through others' guidance was also a common approach. The question is, after being shown the solution, did you truly understand it, or did you just mindlessly copy it down?
Now, all the people who can help students solve difficult homework problems or explain new lessons during their school years can "possess" a single character named ChatGPT. Thinking positively, this will lead to faster learning, more learning, and deeper understanding if desired.
And the real concern lies in those two words, "if you want to." If you truly want to learn, to expand your knowledge, to understand the subject matter deeply, and to elevate your thinking, you will learn in a completely different way than someone who only wants to learn to get it over with. If you truly want to learn, using ChatGPT to find suggestions for essays or to solve math problems isn't harmful. But if you learn just to get it over with, you'll naturally turn ChatGPT into a "substitute" for your brain, and that will inevitably lead to your brain shrinking.
Therefore, teachers' teaching methods should stop focusing solely on the final result, because simply put, a perfectly solved exercise might be solved using ChatGPT. Instead, consider adopting a "flipped classroom" model, where students are not prohibited from using ChatGPT but are allowed to do so, provided they present their own interpretation of the result in class. Give students more opportunities to practice effectively using ChatGPT, and put them under pressure to articulate what they receive from ChatGPT's assistance.
Source: https://thanhnien.vn/lop-hoc-dao-nguoc-voi-chatgpt-185241115234147223.htm
Comment (0)