While these confusions haven't had time to be resolved, many university admissions officers predict further changes in subsequent years, as has always been the case. And at the recent higher education conference, the Ministry of Education and Training is considering two important issues for inclusion in the 2026 admissions regulations: whether to abolish or continue using the academic transcript-based admissions method, and whether to limit the number of choices applicants can make.
In just the last 10 years, university admissions and the high school graduation exam have undergone many changes.
In 2015, we had the national high school graduation exam, organized with two main purposes: to use the results to certify high school graduation and as a basis for university and college admissions. In that year, for university admissions, candidates could register four preferences for the same school and had the right to change their preferences at the last minute. In 2016, adjustments were made to allow candidates to register four preferences but at two different schools. In 2017, candidates were allowed to register an unlimited number of preferences...
By 2020, when the 2019 Education Law came into effect, the national high school graduation exam became the high school graduation exam, with changes related to exam questions, exam organization, graduation assessment, etc. All of these impacts university admissions to varying degrees, from technical adjustments to policy innovations, and this happens almost every year. The introduction of separate exams, competency assessments, and admission methods other than the high school graduation exam score, such as academic transcripts, has significantly changed the university admissions landscape.
In particular, in 2025, the high school graduation exam will be adjusted to accommodate the first cohort of students taking the graduation exam under the 2018 general education program. This will result in a university entrance exam with many changes, including new, confusing, and inaccessible elements for both candidates and universities. Starting with highly specialized concepts like "percentiles" and "score conversion," and a series of complicated formulas for converting standard scores that many jokingly say only those with an engineering degree can understand.
The changes to this year's university admissions process were initially aimed at ensuring fairness, but their complexity and intricacy have led to problems in the admissions process and caused unnecessary confusion and anxiety for candidates and parents.
If you have the opportunity to learn about university admissions in other countries, many people will agree that their regulations, procedures, and conditions are mostly simple, easy to understand, and stable. This not only helps universities develop long-term, stable strategies but also helps candidates establish a suitable study plan.
Admissions is just one of many stages in the training process. When schools are given autonomy, they should also be allowed to decide their own admission methods, as long as they comply with regulations and are accountable. A shirt that only comes in one size cannot fit everyone. Similarly, a single standard cannot be applied to all types of schools. The important thing is that the Ministry...
The Ministry of Education and Training manages the situation at the state level and has sanctions in place to prevent schools from violating regulations if they wish.
Change is for the better, but it needs a long-term vision, at least 5-10 years, instead of making adjustments every year, which creates insecurity and instability for a recruitment process that aims to provide high-quality labor for society.
Source: https://thanhnien.vn/bao-gio-on-dinh-tuyen-sinh-185250919223910118.htm
Comment (0)