Provincial National Assembly deputies contribute opinions to draft laws presented at the session.

On the morning of November 5, comrade Ly Thi Lan, member of the Provincial Party Standing Committee, Head of the National Assembly Delegation working full-time in Tuyen Quang province, chaired the discussion at Group 16 to give opinions on the draft of 4 Law projects, including: Law on Enforcement of Civil Judgments (amended); Law on Judicial Expertise (amended); Law on amending and supplementing a number of articles of the Law on Prevention and Combat of Corruption; Law on amending and supplementing a number of articles of the Law on Intellectual Property.

Delegate Lo Thi Viet Ha spoke in the discussion.

Commenting on the draft Law amending and supplementing a number of articles of the Law on Anti-Corruption, delegate Lo Thi Viet Ha (full-time member of the National Assembly's Committee on Culture and Society) agreed on the political basis, legal basis, and the necessity of promulgating the Law; and agreed with the scope of amendments and supplements of the draft Law. However, the authority to control assets and income of the Delegation Work Committee according to the draft Law still overlaps with a number of subjects under the management of the National Assembly Standing Committee, so it is recommended to study and revise accordingly.

Regarding assets and income that must be declared and the level of fluctuation of assets and income in the year that must be additionally declared: Delegates agreed to increase the value of assets and income that must be declared from 50 million VND to 150 million VND for precious metals, gemstones and other assets; increase the level of fluctuation of assets and income in the year that must be additionally declared from 300 million VND to 1 billion VND. At the same time, the Government should be assigned to provide detailed regulations to flexibly adjust to make the Law more stable.

Delegate Au Thi Mai speaks during the discussion.

Commenting on the draft Law on Judicial Expertise (amended), delegate Au Thi Mai (Provincial Party Committee member, Vice Chairman of the Provincial Fatherland Front Committee, Chairman of the Provincial Women's Union) suggested that in terms of regulations on expanding the scope of socialized judicial expertise at the Judicial Expertise Office, it is necessary to consider expanding some fields that society has a need for such as: information and communication, science and technology, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, food safety, agriculture, forestry and fisheries, wild, endangered, precious and rare animals... to suit the reality and development trends of the judicial expertise profession.

The delegate also said that the socialization of the appraisal office is a new step forward, so it is necessary to clearly stipulate the control mechanism, limit the permission for private offices to participate in appraisal in criminal proceedings, should only focus on civil and administrative fields and must have a strict monitoring mechanism so that economic interests do not influence the conclusion.

Regarding the organization of case-based appraisals, delegates proposed to supplement regulations in the direction of clarifying the subjects performing appraisals and the responsible subjects; establishing a national database on people who can perform case-based appraisals; a mechanism for checking, evaluating and verifying appraisal conclusions; a mechanism for protecting appraisers; and the responsibilities of the appraisal requesting agency, etc.

Delegate Trang A Duong spoke in the discussion.

Commenting on the draft Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement (amended), delegate Trang A Duong (full-time member of the National Assembly's Ethnic Council) suggested that regarding the provisions on ensuring civil judgment enforcement activities (Article 9), it should only stipulate the principle of the State ensuring the budget and necessary conditions to ensure management agencies and civil judgment enforcement agencies, while specific details should be assigned to the Government to stipulate.

Also contributing to the draft Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement (amended), delegate Nguyen Viet Ha (Director of the Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Tuyen Quang branch) proposed to supplement regulations on duties, powers, and coordination mechanisms with the prosecution agencies of the regional Civil Judgment Enforcement Department in civil judgment enforcement. At the same time, review to shorten some time frames in civil judgment enforcement to further speed up the enforcement process, thereby helping to protect the interests of all parties to the maximum.

Delegate Nguyen Viet Ha speaks in the discussion.

Regarding the right to choose a civil enforcement agency: Delegates proposed to supplement regulations on the principle of priority in choosing an enforcement agency in cases where the person subject to enforcement and the person entitled to enforcement choose different enforcement agencies to ensure consistency and avoid wasting time in enforcing the judgment due to this problem.

Delegate Vuong Thi Huong (Vice Chairwoman of Pa Vay Su Commune People's Committee) affirmed that the amendment and supplementation of the Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement is necessary to overcome shortcomings in the organization and operation of the civil judgment enforcement agency system, ensuring consistency and synchronization with related laws. Regarding the regulations on preservation and exploitation of judgment enforcement assets, the delegate proposed to add clear criteria for individuals and organizations assigned to preserve assets, including legal capacity, facilities, compensation responsibility and transparent selection process...

Delegate Vuong Thi Huong speaks during the discussion.

Regarding the professional ethics standards of bailiffs and enforcement officers, delegates proposed that the Government or the Ministry of Justice issue separate regulations on professional ethics standards for unified implementation.

Delegates also gave their opinions on the following issues: Organization of the civil judgment enforcement agency system; enforced judgments and decisions; interpretation of terms and pointed out some overlapping contents in articles and clauses. Delegates emphasized that this amendment to the Law on Civil Judgment Enforcement must aim at streamlining the apparatus, improving the effectiveness of judgment enforcement organization, ensuring the legitimate rights and interests of people and organizations, contributing to building a professional, honest and modern judiciary.

PV

Source: https://baotuyenquang.com.vn/thoi-su-chinh-tri/202511/dbqh-tinh-dong-gop-y-kien-vao-cac-du-an-luat-trinh-tai-ky-hop-a1957b5/