When launching, the organizing committee affirmed that it will focus on selecting and honoring voted works with profound humanity; having a wide and long-term influence on social life, making an important contribution to the cause of building and defending the Vietnamese Fatherland. In particular, priority will be given to literary and artistic works praising the glorious historical tradition of the Party, the great President Ho Chi Minh ; the great victories and achievements of Vietnam after the country's reunification.
![]() |
| Illustration photo: hanoimoi.vn |
With the desire to honor creative work and the persistent efforts of artists in building a good revolutionary literature and art, the standard vote will become the basis for research and teaching in schools, contributing to encouraging the young generation to continue to be creative and orienting aesthetics towards the public.
That is the purpose, but the concern is that in the field of literature, looking deeply into the 14 selected literary works, looking broadly at the literary picture of half a century, it is easy to see regrets.
Up to now, valuable literary works have been compared to an eagle flying to the horizon of beauty with two wings of creation and reception. A bird cannot fly with one wing. Art is not only about creation. Art exists thanks to reception. But it seems that the appraisers and those in charge have not paid enough attention and sensitivity to the psychology of reception of readers, especially those who have directly held guns.
The resistance war against the US, to save the country and people like them, all the people, the whole nation must be honored, praised, affirmed, but a "problematic" novel that has caused controversy is being honored, because of its somewhat insensitive view of the just resistance war, without distinguishing between friend and foe, equating revolutionary soldiers with "puppet soldiers". That leads to the reaction of some veterans - readers who are vulnerable to the "rewriting" of history. It can be explained that it is a request for "national reconciliation" in the new context. But is it necessary to use "history obscuration" as a bridge to "heal" the wounds of war?
Although it is not too narrow-minded or one-sided to comment and evaluate a literary work that many people are interested in, the fact that a work is honored but more or less causes division in both the literary world and the public is also something that deserves serious thought.
A common truth that must always be respected and affirmed is that literary and artistic creation must be for the Fatherland, for the people, for the revolution, for the values of truth, goodness and beauty. If any literary and artistic work is not imbued with the viewpoint and creative purpose of honoring history, upholding the present, and orienting the future, then that work will find it difficult to fulfill its noble mission.
Source: https://www.qdnd.vn/van-hoa/doi-song/phung-su-to-quoc-phai-la-su-menh-cua-van-chuong-1015308







Comment (0)