The Politburo requires resolutely replacing weak and profiteering appraisal officers.

(Dan Tri) - Along with training, fostering and having a mechanism to protect cadres doing appraisal work, the Politburo requires resolutely replacing weak, selfish and degraded people.

On behalf of the Politburo , Standing member of the Secretariat Tran Cam Tu signed and issued Directive No. 54 of the Politburo on strengthening the Party's leadership over judicial appraisal and asset valuation work.

Besides positive results such as improved quality of forensic examination and asset valuation, contributing to the recovery of lost assets for the State, the Politburo also pointed out some limitations.

Typical examples are the phenomenon of pushing, avoiding, and delaying judicial appraisal and asset valuation activities; information and inter-sectoral coordination are still limited and ineffective.

Standing member of the Secretariat Tran Cam Tu (Photo: Pham Thang).

In order to create strong changes in the work of judicial appraisal and asset valuation, the Politburo requires Party committees and organizations at all levels to increase awareness and responsibility for this work.

According to the Politburo, this must be considered an important political task, associated with controlling power in performing public duties, preventing corruption, waste, negativity, and protecting justice.

The Politburo also emphasized the need to establish a mechanism for requesting appraisal and valuation of assets in the direction of only requesting and requesting when professional opinions are really needed.

“Absolutely do not abuse requests and requests, and do not use appraisal and valuation to replace investigation work and fulfill the obligation to prove of the prosecution agency,” the Politburo Directive clearly states.

In addition, there must be a mechanism to determine minimum damages in cases where the violation is clear and does not require or cannot be assessed or priced.

The Politburo requires the prosecution agencies to proactively apply appropriate methods to determine damages, avoid dependence on appraisal and valuation results, especially in simple and clear cases; study and expand the right to request appraisal to ensure proactive collection of evidence and fulfillment of the parties' obligation to prove in civil and administrative proceedings.

The Politburo also requested decentralization and delegation of powers in consultation and implementation of appraisal and valuation, clearly defining authority and responsibility among levels and sectors to overcome the situation of pushing and avoiding.

Completing and strengthening judicial appraisal and asset valuation organizations is also an important task oriented by the Politburo.

The Politburo noted the need to mobilize and attract competent professional organizations inside and outside the public sector to participate in judicial appraisal activities; promote the socialization of a number of appraisal fields...

At the same time, the Politburo requested to perfect the title standards, selection mechanism, training, fostering of legal knowledge, professional skills and protection mechanism for appraisers and valuers to work impartially, objectively, fairly and uprightly.

“Resolutely replace weak, selfish, and degraded people; at the same time, implement a mechanism to attract and promote good experts, scientists , and capable professional staff inside and outside the public sector,” the Politburo emphasized.

According to the Politburo, it is possible to apply special and outstanding support policies for full-time appraisers and part-time appraisers receiving salaries from the State budget in a number of dangerous and toxic fields and specialties that are difficult to attract people to work.

Along with investment in resources and human resources, according to the Politburo, it is necessary to improve the effectiveness of State management, focusing on inspection, supervision and handling of violations.

In particular, the Politburo noted the need to have mechanisms and strictly handle acts of delay, avoidance, shirking, lack of responsibility, lack of impartiality and objectivity in appraisal and valuation; incorrect requests and requests; failure to fully perform obligations and responsibilities in soliciting, evaluating, and using appraisal and valuation conclusions of assets.

Source: https://dantri.com.vn/thoi-su/bo-chinh-tri-yeu-cau-kien-quyet-thay-the-can-bo-giam-dinh-yeu-kem-vu-loi-20251206072454396.htm